asda?‰PNG  IHDR ? f ??C1 sRGB ??é gAMA ±? üa pHYs ? ??o¨d GIDATx^íüL”÷e÷Y?a?("Bh?_ò???¢§?q5k?*:t0A-o??¥]VkJ¢M??f?±8\k2íll£1]q?ù???T nominal.image.width

nominal.image.width

nominal.image.width — The nominal image width

Synopsis

<xsl:param name="nominal.image.width" select="6 * $pixels.per.inch"></xsl:param>

Description

Graphic widths expressed as a percentage are problematic. In the following discussion, we speak of width and contentwidth, but the same issues apply to depth and contentdepth.

A width of 50% means "half of the available space for the image." That's fine. But note that in HTML, this is a dynamic property and the image size will vary if the browser window is resized.

A contentwidth of 50% means "half of the actual image width". But what does that mean if the stylesheets cannot assess the image's actual size? Treating this as a width of 50% is one possibility, but it produces behavior (dynamic scaling) that seems entirely out of character with the meaning.

Instead, the stylesheets define a nominal.image.width and convert percentages to actual values based on that nominal size.